Very nice. I think this iteration of site rules does a lot more to define the spirit rather than attempt to cover more examples. As such, I think it says who we are and what site management wants, providing people think. If they don't, to me, that seems clear evidence they need some education in the 'maturity' department, which the discussion of punitive measures makes clear.
So, yeah. This is good. *smiles*
It's now on my list to read over the FAQ again when I'm back from this con and make sure everything is discussed properly, all links still work, and all that, but I can think of few better reasons to do the once-over!