You are either not logged in or not registered with our community. Click here to register.
 
December 02, 2016, 12:05:49 PM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Click here if you are having problems.
Default Wide Screen Beige Lilac Rainbow Black & Blue October Send us your theme!

Hark!  The Herald!
Holiday Issue 2016

Wiki Blogs Dicebot

Author Topic: Stratfordians, Anti-Stratfordians, and The Tempest  (Read 793 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Spookie MonsterTopic starter

Stratfordians, Anti-Stratfordians, and The Tempest
« on: March 21, 2008, 05:44:03 PM »
First, know this: I'm an anti-Stratfordian.  That is, I've become convinced that William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon probably didn't write Shakespeare's works.  More specifically, I lean toward the notion that the Oxfordians -- those who believe that Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford probably did write most of them -- are correct.

Now, I'm not here to debate the issue, but I would like to point out to any interested parties that several recent papers have been published which establish that The Tempest was in fact written before 1604.  This is important because many Stratfordians stated that Edward de Vere couldn't have been the author of Shakespeare's works because 1) Edward de Vere died in 1604 and 2) The Tempest was written after 1604.  Therefore, the Stratfordians' strongest argument has been refuted.

Spel