Actually not exactly true the Catholic Book of Excorcism (I own a copy) places Succubi and Incubi as demons, so does the Jewish and Muslim Faiths the latter adds the Jin and they are just EVIL.
Two things about that: 1) The Catholic Book of Exorcism is neither canonical nor doctrinal (nor is it Biblical, or sanctioned by the Pope). 2) The Djinn are pre-Muslim "evil" spirits that were appropriated by Muhammad when he was creating Islam. Pre-Mohammad, Djinn were simply desert dwelling fire spirits that acted roughly similar to will-o-wisps, luring people into the desert, into sandstorms and the like. It took the foundation of Islam to turn them into "evil" servants of Shaitan.
Also note, according to suppressed books of the Old Testament, Lucifer was cast out of Heaven for loving
God too much, so much so that he refused to serve Humanity first and God second. Of course, the medieval Church needed a scapegoat, so they suppressed those books of the Bible, and are still suppressing them (as are most Protestant sects).
As for Spirits ever read the Haunting of Morella or see Poltergeist or any other movie iwth EVIL spirits in it. In The Entity a ghose even raped a woman several times brutally.
Entirely possible, never said it wasn't. However, Spirits can also include your dead great-grandma and ascended figures like saints and bodhisattvas.
Witches ever hear of a Satanic Witch one that follows the Left Hand Path- they are not all nice. Look at Buffy when Willow turned evil.
So many problems with this statement that I'm not sure I even want to start . . . "Satanic witches" are a modern 18th to 20th century creation. Secondly, that's beside the point of the initial response. Thirdly, citing Buffy
as a legitimate source regarding witchcraft is about as good as citing Charmed
. Neither show really knows what its talking about regarding the subject.
This is from Goddess Lilac in SO YOU WANT TO START A GAME- verbatim copy:
Rule the First: Characters involved in sexual scenes must have passed the onset of puberty, or whatever cultural/racial equivelant. If someone is a million years old, but looks like a twelve-year-old boy/girl, that's not allowed. A two-month-old clone that is functionally twenty is, however, fine. If you want a hard, lower limit on age in your games, you can use 16.
Beside the point. Especially as that was added after a bunch of people complained to her, as I recall. Anyway, as noted, it's beside the point. Appearances and real ages of 18+, there's no reason for anything else in this setting, given that clones, etc. are impossible.(My apologies, edited to clean up for Mods)
(turning off frustration mode . . . now, I hope)