You are either not logged in or not registered with our community. Click here to register.
December 12, 2018, 12:26:06 AM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Click here if you are having problems.
Default Wide Screen Beige Lilac Rainbow Black & Blue October Send us your theme!

Wiki Blogs Dicebot

Author Topic: The Macho Sperm Myth  (Read 350 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LiliasTopic starter

  • La Que Sabe ~ Shamaniac ~ MelinoĆ« ~ The Unforgiving
  • Oracle
  • Carnite
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Location: Gallery of Whispers
  • Gender: Female
  • Only mostly naughty
  • My Role Play Preferences
  • View My Rolls
  • Referrals: 2
The Macho Sperm Myth
« on: August 28, 2018, 10:57:51 AM »
Long, sciencey read, but important insights into the practical side of fertility issues.

Online Sara Nilsson

Re: The Macho Sperm Myth
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2018, 12:49:10 AM »
That was a fascinating read :)

Offline Inkidu

  • E's Resident Girlomancer, Dedicated Philogynist, The Compartive of a Superlative, SLG's Sammich Life-Giver
  • Lord
  • Addict
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Location: In a staring contest with the Void.
  • Gender: Male
  • My Role Play Preferences
  • View My Rolls
  • Referrals: 0
Re: The Macho Sperm Myth
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2018, 09:13:32 PM »
As an adult who has had several classes in biology and anatomy under his belt, I don't think I ever bought into the idea that there shall only be one. It's pretty clear in the volume used that this is a lottery approach. Though I tend to think that the article skewed a little too hard. I mean after all the female egg is still a passive recipient even if the supporting organs are much more active. It doesn't take an active role in screening anything.

Still an interesting read, but anyone who thinks that men stay reproductively perfect against the rigors of time is delusional. Though on both sides it should be noted that the dreaded 40 barrier for men and women is only a 1% increase of birth defects on average, which is statistically irrelevant.