The only thing I am concerned with at the moment is the age of the princess, which would mean the heir would be older (unless they followed a patriarchal kingdom aspect, in which the eldest son is the first in line) Mainly because the princess (the one born of the royal family, played by Lenka) is 25, so if we follow the convention of the oldest child of the family on the throne is the heir... that means the heir is older than 25. If we go by the convention of ages here, if the queen had the heir at 14 and then the 25 yr old princess at 16 my minimum age would be 41, which feels like pushing it.... unless this world is relatively advanced in healthcare and medicine. 41 just always strikes me as an almost too old age in older times, considering most people barely lived into their forties 300+ years ago. I'm just trying to figure out a good concept here without having to make people change things about their characters, because I don't want to do that to anyone... It would make me deeply sad.