So according to this poll, twelve people said they are under 65, yet the next poll only has 10 people saying "no" to being over 65. I think we lost two people! Or they entered some weird time-space warp and aged faster than the rest of us.
Hmmm... well, I did specifically writeAre you 65 or younger?
andAre you 65 or older?
and notAre you younger than 65?
andAre you older than 65?
or some other combination just to be certain that 65-year-olds couldn't shrug and say, "Well, we're in neither
category." Ultimately this was me joshing CuriousKandi, of course, who seemed to be interpreting -- innocently or slyly -- the various "Are You?" questions as being about one's age. I chose 65 because the hints that CuriousKandi dropped suggested that she herself was 65. Anyhow, because of the phrasing, 65-year-olds are indeed able to answer both questions positively.
Not that the votes as currently counted allow for that. Just sayin'.Spel
In these golden years...