I just on to get caught up.
This is one of those special cases in which I will allow a player to remain part of the game through a period of inactivity, as I feel it's the fairest thing to do, on the grounds that Night has had a solid history of participation in this game, that he has no choice in his break, and that he has clearly stated his intent to be an active player again as soon as he's able. I will simply not tally a vote from Night until he's able to vote again.
When it comes to accusations, also in the interest of fair play, NightOwl will still be a viable target for lynching. Just keep in mind Night will not be active to defend themselves, so please be gentle in your discussions and try to keep a sound reasoning from something game related that happened when voting. "Nightowl has been quiet lately" isn't going to be a great reason to vote, but "Back in day 3, Night voted against lynching so and so, etc..." it perfectly valid.