Kythia: How so? I think you find me labelling all feminists ratical. I speak only against twitter feminists. By spokespeople I reffer to the anept faces of social justice warriors.
Im sorry if you find me inept, I spoke with calm clarity. Take this if anything.
Those who see no true issue, and insist there is, are not wise but blind.
Further, i will use an example. A situation which shows the problems amoung certain feminists. As well as why people face palm. When, for example. A mans brought to a tearfull apology on tv, told he is a vile pig filled with mysogyny, undermining his staple on history as well as his proudest achievement in his scientific career. Over.... A shirt... It was not a win for women, but a sad sad show of bullying.
And for the record, ya, I meant suffering. Sorry for my inacurate use of grammer. T_T
Cae: I beleive I meant to imply those things are "offensive." Not that they offend me. None the less my point was to show that men are often the villian. Women viewed the victim. Thats what i meant by showing those broad terms. As for my sarcastic quips, Is to show that these kinds of statements are meant to undermine anothers views, things said to silence others. It was not about the offense. Is it offensive to me? Yes. But I was not trying to use my offense. Merely show examples of things that turn people away. Though, Ia gree with your closing words. It's just people needt o try and keep their offense to themselvs when debating, or trying to teach. If all peopleh ear is, that offends me. What are they tol earn other then, you have feelings. (well shoopda woop we all do. Lol. )
Pleasure to meet you to by the way. ^^ Garuss actually speaks highly of your nuetral and peacefull stance.
Apple: Im kind of sick, so im sorry for the short rebuttle. And honestly I made my self look dumb. Well, here goes an attempt at rectifying that.
Listen, im not trying to undermine feminism. I merely tried, to no avail, to explain that feminism,but not all feminists, about the rights of women. Not men. There for is a movement that only adresses women. This is ok. I just have a disslike for the ditestable words of a few, whom are highly regarded. While other, more fair acivists are scolded, for their lack of extremity. FactualFeminist is a feminist I follow and often agree with. An educated women with a solid background. Whom supports her claims with facts. Listen, Aglitarians are those who advocate rights for men and women of any race or sexuality. Feminists advocate rights for women. The missconception is that feminist is the word for equal rights. Im not saying feminists as a whole are not for equal rights but am merely pointing out the ignorance of broadening a word for all equal rights when a suitable term exists. Im basically nit picking defenition. In the end it is justa l abel, but my ocd demands propper labelling. Lol. ^_^; I hope that made sense?
Bare with me when I say, Feminism is currently not taken seriously for one reason. As my mom told me " Pick your battles." What does this mean? Feminism is currently a buzz word associated with hating men, becouse. Rather then carefully picking battles. They try to change, or call offense to too much at one time. When someone doese this they overwhelm, and ears shut down as a result.
Please, believe me. I listen. I will name off Ayaa Hirsi Ali. As a sensible, well worded feminist. None the less I thank you for being civil when you had every right to feel offended by me.
Edit: by the way though, Im no talking 1960's. Im talking, Gamer gate, Not Your Shield, protesting at events for mens rights, twitter feminists. Modern day crazies that make blogposts saying men should have thier nuts chopped off, and reproduction be left to sperm banks. (Not making it up, people really say these kinds of things. I wish, wish, wish I was joking.) Im not bassing opinion on the past, merely our mind boggling present.