You are either not logged in or not registered with our community. Click here to register.
 
December 03, 2016, 03:51:04 AM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Click here if you are having problems.
Default Wide Screen Beige Lilac Rainbow Black & Blue October Send us your theme!

Hark!  The Herald!
Holiday Issue 2016

Wiki Blogs Dicebot

Author Topic: Steampunk Harem - Elements of Dom/Sub and Romance (F seeking M)  (Read 431 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RainfireTopic starter

Alright, this is for all those guys who:
1) love the Victorian Steampunk universe.
2) wish they owned a harem.
3) have a dominant, demanding side, even to the point of doing something that edges onto non-con (but not pain/torture/vore).
4) like a submissive, youthful, obedient (or willfully stubborn) girl to make all their own: mental/psychological manipulation is an option, as well as merely exerting your master-ship.


NOTE: If you want this to be more of a romance, you will have to leave out the more brutal treatments that I allow (see below), but if you're more about Dom/Sub and getting it as kinky and messy as possible, then go for the rougher, multi-partner stuff if that's what you wish.


Note that the elements/preferences listed below are not all inclusive. I only list the ones that would be limited to that scenario. For everything else I want/you're allowed to do, check my RP preferences.


Elements for Romance:
~Some degree of privacy: only the two of them in the room when he uses her, and never forcing her to watch him with others.
~Mild hair pulling (holding on at the roots with the purpose of direction or securing her there)
~Cunnilingus
~Snowballing
~Kissing (intense)
~Foreplay - massaging, caressing, tickling, teasing, anything gentle or that gives her pleasure
~Impregnation - this would be used primarily as a plot device
~Suckling (If doing dom/sub emphasis, this would have to be rough, mixed with biting)


Elements for (Primarily) Dom/Sub:
~Spanking
~Biting
~Gagging/Choking/Hand-on-neck Pinning her Down
~Deep-throating
~Slapping
~MMF Orgies
~MFF Orgies (I don't know how good I'd be at these, though)
~Dirty Talking
~Cum Facials
~Tying/Chaining/Bondage and Restraints
~Blindfold (Could be used in romance thread, at the beginning)
~Breath Control - limiting her air
~Fear
~Severe Hair pulling (yanking, maybe pulling on the ends, with intent of causing pain)
~Physical force and non-consensual
~Humiliation, Degradation, and Verbal Abuse
~Fisting - vaginal and/or anal
~Cervical penetration
~Multiple penetration
~Use of sex toys




To make this clear: the plot option with an emphasis on Dom/Sub would not have her enjoying, necessarily, what he does to her, unless you choose to employ mental/psychological manipulation and make it so that she does learn to enjoy it. The plot option with the emphasis on romance would have a gentler master in control, one that she could---and will---fall for, and maybe he does for her too, or maybe he doesn't, but we can work that out as we go along.


Please PM me if you are interested in this and would like to work out a plot/thread with me. I prefer forum threads, but PM threads are acceptable, if that's really what you'd rather do.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2014, 07:03:08 PM by Rainfire »

Offline RainfireTopic starter

Re: Steampunk Harem - Elements of Dom/Sub and Romance (F seeking M)
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2014, 07:02:32 PM »
I am bumping this because when I tried to get this idea off the ground, it was too busy of a time in my life and anybody who was interested in it then has not replied to my four-month-late PM replies (I can't say that I blame them). I am bumping it so that people know that it's still open and that it's still here, and hopefully some fresh eyes will get a peek at it.

Offline RainfireTopic starter

Re: Steampunk Harem - Elements of Dom/Sub and Romance (F seeking M)
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2014, 07:32:10 AM »
This idea has been taken and I appreciate all those who have responded to it via PM. I am excepting no more at this time. Thank you.