You are either not logged in or not registered with our community. Click here to register.
 
December 04, 2016, 10:43:51 PM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Click here if you are having problems.
Default Wide Screen Beige Lilac Rainbow Black & Blue October Send us your theme!

Hark!  The Herald!
Holiday Issue 2016

Wiki Blogs Dicebot

Author Topic: Starting small: Undermountain PF (full)  (Read 7527 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ShadowFox89Topic starter

Starting small: Undermountain PF (full)
« on: December 09, 2011, 06:15:55 PM »
 So, I decided to start my first game off here on E gradually. 3.5 Dungeons and Dragons, first level, 36 point buy. Using the Undermountain published adventure, then moving past that at level 10 (depending on what the players wish).

 I'll be looking for 4-5 players, and would like to cover the basics. 2-3 times a day for posting from players, and you can expect me to be able to reply most of the time. Run any books by me first if you want to use a class from them, I'm fairly lenient.

 I believe that is it.... Any questions?

edit: Current cast is as follows

Inkidu - Shadlin Ghost-Step, Human Monk
NicciKotor - Horo, Wolfgirl Sorceress
CrazyIvan - Jessica Fa'Bahue Human Rogue
who149 - Le'thral, Elf Fighter
« Last Edit: December 21, 2011, 03:56:39 AM by ShadowFox89 »

Offline BenedictWolfe

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2011, 07:36:33 AM »
What will the nature of the adult content be (since you didn't post this in the Non-Sexual forum)?

Setting wise, what year does this take place?

Offline Tamhansen

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2011, 08:08:47 AM »
yes, I do have that question. What if any adult content are you looking for. As for the adventure itself, I'm surely interested. I'm probably going to go with a class from the PHB1 so fairly simple, but that might change based on group.

Offline Snake

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2011, 02:24:46 PM »
I'm interested Ihave to say :3

Offline ShadowFox89Topic starter

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2011, 04:25:50 PM »
What will the nature of the adult content be (since you didn't post this in the Non-Sexual forum)?

Setting wise, what year does this take place?

 Not sure about what sexual content will be within. Obviously exotic, as players aren't going to be limited to just human.

 Setting wise, generic setting. I have a tendency of dislike towards Forgotten Realms, so I've never bothered running a game in that setting before.

Offline Pockets

  • Lady Kitsune's Body Snuggleuficus Secretwriter's Leprechaun
  • Lord
  • Seducer
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Location: In my own little world, they know me there.
  • Gender: Male
  • Sometimes it's not about what's in the Pocket
  • My Role Play Preferences
  • View My Rolls
  • Referrals: 2
Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2011, 06:26:34 PM »
Count me in. Dual wielding Rogue to be listed soon. Or I can see about sending it via PM.

Offline ShadowFox89Topic starter

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2011, 06:27:09 PM »
Posting here is fine. Just make sure to spoiler so you don't take up too much room :)

Offline TheGlyphstone

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2011, 06:28:20 PM »
Not sure about what sexual content will be within. Obviously exotic, as players aren't going to be limited to just human.

 Setting wise, generic setting. I have a tendency of dislike towards Forgotten Realms, so I've never bothered running a game in that setting before.

If it's Level 1, I'd assume you'd put it in the Human category, since none of the starting PC races are non-humanoid, and the 'Human' RP category does mention including near-humans like elves.

Offline ShadowFox89Topic starter

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #8 on: December 12, 2011, 06:46:32 PM »
Right, so it'd be Human then, not sure about anything else involved. I suppose it depends on what player interest leans towards.

Offline Snake

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #9 on: December 13, 2011, 12:38:32 PM »
I'm still interested but dislike starting at level 1  Undermountain is pretty dangerous. you almost need to be a lvl 5 or greater to even have a chance.

Offline ShadowFox89Topic starter

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #10 on: December 13, 2011, 12:42:32 PM »
 A 4-person group going carefully shouldn't have too much problem with the starting areas of Undermountain.

Online Inkidu

  • E's Resident Girlomancer, Dedicated Philogynist, The Compartive of a Superlative, SLG's Sammich Life-Giver
  • Lord
  • Addict
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Location: In a staring contest with the Void.
  • Gender: Male
  • My Role Play Preferences
  • View My Rolls
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #11 on: December 13, 2011, 09:12:06 PM »
I'm interested. I've been trying to join (and start) a DnD game on here for a while. I'm more than happy to play a human fighter or barbarian, though I know nothing about the setting. Any limits on starting gold/equipment?

Er... if I can still play.

Offline ShadowFox89Topic starter

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #12 on: December 13, 2011, 09:15:19 PM »
Yes, of course you can still play. Setting knowledge isn't needed, as we are using a generic setting to give players room to make things up for backgrounds (you want to be the prince of a nearby kingdom in disguise? go for it). I won't be going first come basis, but will likely close recruitment after a certain time.

Offline CrazyIvan

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #13 on: December 13, 2011, 09:18:39 PM »
are you still looking for people?

Online Inkidu

  • E's Resident Girlomancer, Dedicated Philogynist, The Compartive of a Superlative, SLG's Sammich Life-Giver
  • Lord
  • Addict
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Location: In a staring contest with the Void.
  • Gender: Male
  • My Role Play Preferences
  • View My Rolls
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #14 on: December 13, 2011, 09:21:28 PM »
Yes, of course you can still play. Setting knowledge isn't needed, as we are using a generic setting to give players room to make things up for backgrounds (you want to be the prince of a nearby kingdom in disguise? go for it). I won't be going first come basis, but will likely close recruitment after a certain time.
Now I'm thinking I want to be a paladin or a monk. Oh well, off to find the standard point-buy charts and put together a character sheet.

Offline ShadowFox89Topic starter

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #15 on: December 13, 2011, 09:34:45 PM »
are you still looking for people?

 I will be likely until the end of the year.

 Oh, and 36pt buy for stats. I like high powered games.
« Last Edit: December 14, 2011, 12:33:40 PM by ShadowFox89 »

Offline CrazyIvan

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #16 on: December 13, 2011, 09:36:41 PM »
what classes do you need and how many books do you want to use, cause some are pretty broken

Online Inkidu

  • E's Resident Girlomancer, Dedicated Philogynist, The Compartive of a Superlative, SLG's Sammich Life-Giver
  • Lord
  • Addict
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Location: In a staring contest with the Void.
  • Gender: Male
  • My Role Play Preferences
  • View My Rolls
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #17 on: December 14, 2011, 12:27:16 PM »
I will be likely until the end of the year.

 Oh, and 32pt buy for stats. I like high powered games.
Er... do you mean 36? Because that's what was in the first post.

Offline ShadowFox89Topic starter

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #18 on: December 14, 2011, 12:33:59 PM »
 I don't know what you're talking about  ::)

Offline TheGlyphstone

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #19 on: December 14, 2011, 12:45:35 PM »
what classes do you need and how many books do you want to use, cause some are pretty broken

Good point. Ban the PHB, to start with. :-)

Offline Snake

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #20 on: December 14, 2011, 01:10:53 PM »
I've got an idea for a human soulknife. :3

Offline ShadowFox89Topic starter

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #21 on: December 14, 2011, 01:40:46 PM »
Good point. Ban the PHB, to start with. :-)

 Good point. The player's handbook has three of the most broken classes in the entire game: the cleric, the druid, and the wizard.

Offline TheGlyphstone

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #22 on: December 14, 2011, 01:50:12 PM »
Good point. The player's handbook has three of the most broken classes in the entire game: the cleric, the druid, and the wizard.

Technically four or five most broken, if you allow Paladin and Monk as 'too-weak' broken.

Online Inkidu

  • E's Resident Girlomancer, Dedicated Philogynist, The Compartive of a Superlative, SLG's Sammich Life-Giver
  • Lord
  • Addict
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Location: In a staring contest with the Void.
  • Gender: Male
  • My Role Play Preferences
  • View My Rolls
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #23 on: December 14, 2011, 01:52:33 PM »
Technically four or five most broken, if you allow Paladin and Monk as 'too-weak' broken.
I've known so pretty uber Paladins and monks, and that's without any real mini/maxing or anything. :\

Offline TheGlyphstone

Re: Starting small: Undermountain 3.5 (looking for players)
« Reply #24 on: December 14, 2011, 01:59:20 PM »
I've known so pretty uber Paladins and monks, and that's without any real mini/maxing or anything. :\
Point-for-optimization point, Paladins and Monks are the weakest core classes...you can make them good, but you can make any other class as good or better for the same amount of effort.

It also depends on context - if the Fighter likes to carry a Tower Shield and Full Plate, and thinks standing in one place and waving his longsword will convince the monsters to hit him instead of the squishies (and the DM agrees), the Wizard likes spamming Magic Missile and Fireball, and the Cleric only memorizes Cure spells, a Monk can indeed look good.