You are either not logged in or not registered with our community. Click here to register.
 
December 03, 2016, 04:04:24 PM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Click here if you are having problems.
Default Wide Screen Beige Lilac Rainbow Black & Blue October Send us your theme!

Hark!  The Herald!
Holiday Issue 2016

Wiki Blogs Dicebot

Author Topic: New Big Group Games Policy  (Read 473 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LunarSageTopic starter

New Big Group Games Policy
« on: June 18, 2011, 08:12:06 PM »
Caeli made an announcement that as of now, OOC thread posts in group games will not count toward the 1000 posts needed for big game status here.

Just out of curiosity... what was the reasoning behind this?  I'm not mad, though this does mean my group game will have to wait a lot longer for big game status (bummer).  Cool though, I will get over it and move on.  I'd just like to know why the change was made.  Thanks in advance for taking the time to answer.  :-)

Online Oniya

  • StoreHouse of Useless Trivia
  • Oracle
  • Carnite
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Location: Just bouncing through. Hi! City of Roses, Pennsylvania
  • Gender: Female
  • One bad Motokifuka. Also cute and FLUFFY!
  • My Role Play Preferences
  • View My Rolls
  • Referrals: 3
Re: New Big Group Games Policy
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2011, 08:15:30 PM »
If I had to guess, I'd say that a group game with 1000 IC posts is more 'well-established' and likely to stick around, as opposed to a group game with lots of side chatter and few IC posts that may or may not stick around.

That's entirely speculation on my part, though.

Offline Myrleena

Re: New Big Group Games Policy
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2011, 08:58:52 PM »
Actually, I think it was that way to begin with...I've been in/run two games that have gotten into the Big Group subforums, and in both cases it didn't happen until after IC posts exceeded 1000. *shrugs*

Offline Saerrael

  • ~~~Seraph ; In love~~~ Do you like what you see? Let me entertain ya ítill you scream.
  • Champion
  • Carnite
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Location: You don't know how you took it You just know what you got Oh Lordy you've been stealing from the thieves And you got caught
  • Gender: Male
  • Hold me, thrill me, kiss me, kill me.
  • My Role Play Preferences
  • View My Rolls
  • Referrals: 6
Re: New Big Group Games Policy
« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2011, 09:13:20 PM »
It's used to be 50% of OOC posts + all of the IC posts combined had to reach 1k posts.

Offline Trieste

  • Faerie Queen; Her Imperial Lubemajesty; Willing Victim
  • Dame
  • Carnite
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2005
  • Location: In the middle of Happily Ever After with a dark Prince Charming.
  • Gender: Female
  • I am many things - dull is not one of them.
  • My Role Play Preferences
  • View My Rolls
  • Referrals: 4
Re: New Big Group Games Policy
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2011, 12:53:20 AM »
Actually, it was never previously codified. This is not a change so much as a codification. Previously, whether your OOC posts were counted depended on the staffer you asked. I can't remember who did what, but I personally would only count the OOC posts if the group game was just shy of 1000 IC posts, so that they would go ahead and get their forum anyway. Another staffer always counted ALL OOC posts and would give people a group forum even if they had 200 IC posts and 800 OOC posts. And still another staffer would never count the OOC posts.

So what probably happened is that staff discussed it amongst themselves and agreed that counting only IC posts was what they would all do from now on.

Offline Caeli

Re: New Big Group Games Policy
« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2011, 01:04:13 AM »
Trieste hit the nail on the head exactly. :)

The policy was somewhat ambiguous and differed between staff members, so after some recent doings, we felt that it would be best to pick something that can apply across all situations and make that clear for everyone.