Seeking Pathfinder 1E or D&D 5E

[Mr L]

I like that! Gotta remember to keep it around.

[Vergil Tanner]

Oh, it is a wonderful piece of 3PP. I love it to pieces, especially when I'm playing an archer xD

I'd be playing a Ranger with a Giant Owl companion if I thought the GM would be ok with me riding a flying owl, but for now I'll stick to horses xD

[Mr L]

To be fair, EitR is great for more core Pathfinder. I'm a bigger fan still of Spheres of Might and Power. Gives amazing customization options that do so well in not making characters op, but also letting their build come online faster. A 1st lvl character could start out with effectively PBS, PS, RS, and still have the actual first lvl feat to pick.

[Vergil Tanner]

I've been playing around with Spheres of Might in another game. I can definitely see the appeal, though I personally prefer core over Spheres. But that's only because Spheres takes away a lot of what some of my favourite classes excel at xD

[Mr L]

That's fair, there are parts of core I like better and there's parts I like spheres better (I think spheres can finally make a competent throwing expert that doesn't just suck). I haven't had much of a chance to play with spheres as much, and I'm sad for it lol

[Vergil Tanner]

Oh, I can definitely see the appeal of Spheres. I'm dabbling with an Unchained Monk who's dipping into the Boxing and Open Hand Spheres for some more combat options xD

[Mr L]

Oh yeah, unarmed is so much nicer with spheres too. I have an archetype armiger (weapon specializer class, archetype gives her the Warp sphere early on) who was fun to build and plan for, but idk if she'll get much play.

[Vergil Tanner]

Funnily enough, ranged isn't that much better in Spheres. Not the way I play my archers, anyway xD Mounted combat is also kinda meh in Spheres. Or at least, compared to mounted in Core. xD

[Mr L]

I haven't looked at a ton of options between the two. Oh my character is trying to be a decent tripper with a reach weapon to be able to cause lots of bleed damage. She doesn't even mean to make them bleed lol it's all accidental

[Mr L]

Still looking for a game, little more familiar with 5E again.

[Mr L]

Bump, still interested in either system

[Mr L]

Bumping this because still intereseted!

[Mr L]

Bumping out of desire to play something with a Staff Magus in Pathfinder or a Bladesinger in 5e!

[Blinkin]

Might there be room for one more?

[Mr L]

I don't have a group at all, but you're more than welcome to stay and see if a group forms or comes along!

[Blinkin]

Thanks. Who knows, GM's have appeared before when I make an appearance. lol I'm afraid that I would make a horrible GM though. I use to be decent in my younger days, but we're talking AD&D and Early editions of GURPS. The first time that I tried to run Pathfinder... well, crash and burned would be really, really generous.

[Mr L]

I tried running for a discord group, but drama in that channel killed the game before they hit lvl 2.

[Blinkin]

Yeah, drama can be a game killer. I wish that I had enough time to do actual live play these days, but if I get half an hour at any given time, I'm doing really well.

You know, I can count on one finger the number of times that my character has leveled in an on-line game? It was a Way Of The Wicked path and the player turn over was astounding, but the character did reach level 2. It's one of the reasons why I prefer to start play above level 1 these days. Nothing against 1st level, I just would like to see more than city guardsmen, kobalts and goblins. ;)

Of course, I should give up the idea of a purely melee character and do what everyone else does; take a magic class as primary and multiclass. I've never been a min/maxer anyway.